Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Valeri in SoCal's avatar

Restoring Roe would be a good start, but it’s not enough.

The SC had a “no undue burden” standard that never really was enforced. Republicans kept chip, chip, chipping away at our rights and imposing medically unnecessary hurdles to obtaining an abortion. Waiting periods. Hospital privileges for doctors. Medically unnecessary tests. Requirements to setup a clinic like an expensive medical-surgical center. Protestors with bullhorns to harass patients. None of it made women safer. It was all nonsense intended to shame and control women.

We should NOT be talking about expanding exceptions, we should be taking about eliminating bans — we don’t need exceptions if there are no bans.

Women should decide based upon the available accurate information provided by their trusted advisors.

We trust women to raise children. We must trust women to decide when, and if, we have children. We deserve accurate information about our options. Women, not the state, not a panel of doctors, not anyone else but the woman should make the final decision about the healthcare she receives.

Doctors should never be criminalized for providing quality medical care. Doctors should never be threatened with prison, fines, and loss of license for providing standard medical care when treating any patient.

Abortion on demand and without apology. It just works.

Expand full comment
Lesley's avatar

This gives me hope that we can demand more than just reinstating Roe. No one should ever have to beg for life-saving care at ANY time in their pregnancy. Share this with everyone you know.

Thanks so much for this reporting, Jessica! I certainly don’t expect to see it reported anywhere else.

Expand full comment
40 more comments...

No posts

OSZAR »